Around me seem many exhibitions of body, even more with diversity; every day in my way for the city, the urban buses, and the virtual  created forms and pictures transformed in others. I think is much longer make a recount to them, but I think that everybody knows many examples about announces with sex and body.
Many people know about the love, sex and body, and the “Sexual Freedom”, the large writer Nance Pearcey to call*: “The Religion of Sex”, she says:
When we look at the history of these ideas, we find that, ironically, even those who adopt a pure materialist worldview often end up turning sex into a substitute religion. If you picture matter in the lower history, even materialists keep climbing up into the upper story and claiming religious significance for sexuality. (Pearcey, 2018: 131).
Meaning she argues that sex becomes even more in religion, religion in ague*, appear* human ligand to The Religion of Sex; the society show and exhibition body for becoming too “Freedom Sexual”, and we can’t deny ensign “Love” between it. Love is crucial when talked sex, them hand to hand.
Proposal is that even people use the body with “all rights reserved” by yourself show it gala to moment because society stop the sexual desire with moral thinking, and the message is chastity, but it is meaning repression to desires or passions sexual, then “Freedom Sexual” is like the way for became plenty. It needs to analyze this vision of body and sex because this implies restriction of sexual desires or oppression of them, so thinking it gives to consequences unhappiness and misery in life.
For example, the writer Gilles Lipovestky says that age contemporary is the consumption era, his denomination of this “sexducción”, this is the way for finding human identity, therefore when is subjectivity is the sexuality is better for to have responsibility in yourself, so this is this moment in that body divinize itself; therefore through of sex became human dignity, while trying excluded all moral and dogmatic principles.
And when sex becomes a religion, then nothing is allowed to stand in its way—especially not Christian morality. All the most prominent sexual theorist have been morality as an obstacle to human happiness, an evil force from which we must be liberated. Let’s meet a few of the most influential, and learn how they shaped today’s politically correct sexual orthodoxy. (Pearcey, 2018: 131).
The author Nancy Pearcey argued that sex is showed for someone theorists like a religion that gave it identity and dignity; it is precisely the sexduccion by Lipovesky. Therefore, in this age contemporary sex is the most attractive religion. In this way, it presupposition implies that is enough the individual decision to get dignity and identity. For example, if I decide to modify my body it takes responsibility in life.
The body is divinized by the individual people, he has the last word and he makes sense to the purpose the life; then how is give mean or legality to a decision to a human? The same human, this meaning that the god is human; he is the king of all decisions and the reference frame about all topics about the right people and the body.
So, the question, How moment this decision became the way to get identity? It is not a transfer to one believe to others belief, as a religion, the king is not God (from Worldview Christianity), now the king is human.
En el momento del autoservicio libidinal, el cuerpo y el sexo se vuelven instrumentos de subjetivización-responsabilización, hay que acumular las experiencias, explotar el capital libidinal de cada uno, innovar en las combinaciones. Todo lo que recuerda la inmovilidad, la estabilidad debe desaparecer en provecho de la experimentación y de la iniciativa. De este modo se produce un sujeto, ya no por disciplina sino por personalización del cuerpo bajo la égida del sexo. Su cuerpo es usted, existe para cuidarlo, amarlo, exhibirlo, nada que ver con la máquina. La seducción amplía el ser-sujeto dando una dignidad y una integridad al cuerpo antes ocultado: nudismo, senos desnudos son los síntomas espectaculares de esa mutación por la que el cuerpo se convierte en persona a respetar, a mimar al sol. (Lipovestky, 1986: 31)
At the moment for self-service libidinal, the body and sex become instruments of subjectivization-responsibility, there is accumulated experiences, exploit the libidinal capital of everyone, to innovate in the mix. Everything that remembers the immobility, stability should disappear in benefit to experimentation and the initiative. Therefore it produces a human, this is not for discipline but is for personalization of body under aegis by sex. Seduction extended the human giving to dignity and integrity to the body before to hidden: nudism, sines nudes are spectaculars symptoms of this mutation by which the body becoming in a people to respect, to pamper the sun. (Lipovestky, 1986: 31).
To think, believe, decision, imply conviction, which the game of “deconstruction” by Jacques Derrida and the sexducción of Lipovestky, this became in a new dogma base because says the way for happiness itself, responsibility and morality for the human.
Similarly, are we really a-moralized sex or rather we are only exchanging a previously conceived morality to a new one, that is, we are moving from one religion to another.
Then the Christian worldview (which is the one that is mostly put into question), has not low ideas, instead, Christianity has a worldview complete that answered the hard question about life; so the matter will be which worldview I will accept? For this is necessary to execute an act of faith or just to follow sexducción, by the way, is a new kingdom, “Kingdom of sex”. Well, I think people should be free to choose and not to be seduced because to be seduced is not a free decision, but is a conditional decision. Well if we yet talking about to individual freedom.